The Value of Marxist History
You may be surprised to learn that in a BBC online poll in
2009, Karl Marx topped the list of the millennium’s greatest thinkers (http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/461545.stm).
Marx remains, as Matt Perry puts in his book Marxism and History, “the best hated man of his times,” for many
“his ideas are either bankrupt or immanently relevant.”Marxism is associated
with criticism of capitalism, but what Marxism can also do is give us a
relevant framework of how capitalism functions.
It must first be said that Marxist history need not
necessarily inform Marxist or Socialist politics of revolution – although it
often does. The focus here is on the Marxist conception of history, not on the
politics or desires of Marxists. The key difference is that historians have
used Marxist theory to view society without agreeing with Marxist
politics, people may refer to themselves in this instance as (lower case m)
marxist historians or marxian historians.
A fundamental idea of Marxism is that labour sets humans
apart from the animal kingdom. In that we do not hunt and gather what we need
but organise society into ordered sections that produce a surplus. The term surplus
means production that exceeds the needs of society – so storing excess food and
materials, or the accumulation of capital. For Marx the accumulation of surplus
means exploitation, this is because
the wage of the labour is kept as low as possible so that the employer may make
a surplus. This is part of the dynamics of capitalism, because the employer is
encouraged to do this in order to be competitive. So the term exploitation refers not to excessively
poor wages or situations, but to the relationship between labour and employer
and is a fundamental part of society.
Exploitation is considered an ongoing struggle between those
who try to exploit and those who no longer accept the exploitation. This is the
infamous class struggle, which is
supposed to drive, and unite, society and history. Marxist history does not say
that exploitation developed with capitalism, for example it can be applied to
the phenomenon called the agricultural revolution – when humans began to farm
the land and produce a surplus of food. Those with the power over this surplus
become the exploiters and those without power who must offer their labour for a
share in this power become the exploited.
So Marxism at its most basic splits society into (at least)
two sections, the dominant exploiting class, and the dominated exploited class.
As History develops and becomes more complicated, the number of differing
relationships and modes of production require further development into the many
theories and interpretations of class that exist today. The basic premise of
Marxism then, is that society is propelled by a struggle between different
opposing interests, and that a key insight into these interests is through a
person’s relationship to the way things are produced.
Kit Buchanan